Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika Administrasi (MIDA)menerbitkan artikel hasil penelitian tentang administrasi publik. Namun tidak terbatas pula kepada:



  1. Kebijakan Publik

  2. Manajemen Publik

  3. Layanan Publik

  4. Birokrasi

  5. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat

  6. Pemerintah Daerah

  7. Politik

  8. Tata Kelola Pemerintah

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process


  1. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept confidential and must report to the Editor-in-Chief if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.

  3. Reviewers must evaluate the submitted works objectively as well as present their opinions on the works clearly in the review form.

  4. Reviewers must keep information about the manuscript confidential.

  5. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor-in-Chief and excuse himself from the review process.

 

Publication Frequency

Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika Administrasi (MIDA) Terbit 2 kali setahun pada bulan April dan September.

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya dengan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk publik mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.

 

Tim Editor

Chief Editor : Anggara Setya Saputra, S. Sos, M. AP
Team Editor :
Devit Bagus Indranika, S. Sos, M. Si
Johar Ma’muri, SIP,M.Si
Ranjani, S. Sos, MPA
Nikki Prafitri, S.Sos., M,Si

 

Etika Publikasi

Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika Administrasi (MIDA) is a peer-reviewed journal committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics. To provide our readers with a journal of the highest quality, we state the following principles of Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement. All articles not by these standards will be removed from the publication at any time even after the publication. By the code of conduct, we will report any cases of suspected plagiarism or duplicate publishing to the relevant authorities. MIDA reserves the right to use plagiarism detecting software to screen submitted papers at all times.



  1. Authors must ensure that they have written original works.

  2. Authors must ensure that the manuscript has not been issued elsewhere.

  3. Authors are responsible for language editing before submitting the article.

  4. Authors submitting their works to the journal for publication as original articles confirm that the submitted works represent their authors’ contributions and have not been copied or plagiarized in whole or in part from other works without clearly citing.

  5. Authors must notify MIDA of any conflicts of interest.

  6. Authors must report any errors they discover in their manuscript to MIDA.

  7. Any work or words of other authors, contributors, or sources should be appropriately credited and referenced.

  8. An author agrees to the license agreement before submitting the article.

  9. All articles must be submitted using the online submission procedure.


Editorial Board:



  1. Editorial Board must ensure a fair peer-review of the submitted articles for publication.

  2. Editorial Board must disclose any conflicts of interest.

  3. Editorial Board must ensure that all the information related to the submitted manuscripts is kept confidential before publishing.

  4. Editorial Board must evaluate manuscripts only for their intellectual content.

  5. Editor-in-Chief will coordinate the work of the editors.


Reviewers:



  1. Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on content without regard to ethnic origin, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Reviewers must ensure that all the information related to submitted manuscripts is kept confidential and must report to the Editor-in-Chief if they are aware of copyright infringement and plagiarism on the author’s side.

  3. Reviewers must evaluate the submitted works objectively as well as present their opinions on the works clearly in the review form.

  4. Reviewers must keep information about the manuscript confidential.

  5. A reviewer who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the Editor-in-Chief and excuse himself from the review process.