DILEMA INTERAKSI BIROKRASI DENGAN INSTITUSI POLITIK FORMAL DALAM UPAYA REFORMASI BIROKRASI

Khairurrizqo Khairurrizqo

Abstract


Interaction with formal political institutions puts bureaucracy in a dilemmatic position. On the one hand, bureaucracy involved in politics disrupts public services because of the tendency to take sides. On the other hand, the Bureaucratic Reform Policy is a decision made by actors from formal political institutions. This dilemma is experienced in Indonesia's Bureaucratic Reform Policy which faces internal and external resistance. The internal obstacle is a bureaucracy that is comfortable and unwilling to change while from the external is the interest of political actors who want to manipulate the bureaucracy. Therefore, formal political institutions need to improve their power resources in order to have strong bargaining power and the bureaucracy needs to strengthen its commitment to the principles of transparency and accountability in order to create a complementary relationship.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alynudin, S., & Rawinarno, T. (2018). KAJIAN REVISI UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 5 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA. JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT (Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan Dan Otonomi Daerah), 3(2), 168–182.

Aspinall, E. (2013). A nation in fragments: Patronage and neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 45(1), 27–54.

Bratakusumah, D. S. (2017). Complementary Model In Interaction Between Political Officials And Bureaucrats In Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 1(2), 125–132.

Carino, L. V. (2019). Regime changes, the bureaucracy, and political development. In Handbook of comparative and development public administration (pp. 1053–1064). Routledge.

Choi, N. (2007). Local elections and democracy in Indonesia: the Riau Archipelago. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 37(3), 326–345.

Firman, F. (2017). Meritokrasi dan Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) dalam Pengaruh Pilkada Langsung. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 3(2), 88–105.

Furlong, S. R. (1998). Political influence on the bureaucracy: The bureaucracy speaks. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 39–65.

Giessen, L., Burns, S., Sahide, M. A. K., & Wibowo, A. (2016). From governance to government: The strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification. Policy and Society, 35(1), 71–89.

Hamzah, D. A. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Rekontruksi Pemikiran Dasar serta Contoh Penerapan Pada Ilmu Pendidikan, Sosial & Humaniora. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

Idris, A. (2017). Bingkai Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal Paradigma (Jp), 2(3), 352–357.

Meiwanda, G. (2017). Reformasi Birokrasi Menuju Indonesia Baru, Bersih dan Bermartabat. WEDANA: Jurnal Kajian Pemerintahan, Politik Dan Birokrasi, 3(1), 331–336.

Munandar, A. (2020). Manajemen Strategik dan Mutu Pendidikan Islam. NUR EL-ISLAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 6(2), 73–97.

Ningtyas, V. A. A. (2021). Netralitas Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Pemilu Antara Hak Politik dan Kewajiban Untuk Melaksanakan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Binamulia Hukum, 10(1), 15–30.

Nyadera, I. N., & Islam, M. N. (2020). Link between administration, politics, and bureaucracy. MD NAZMUL ISLAM.

Peters, B. G. (2010a). Bureaucracy and the State. Handbook of European Societies: Social Transformations in the 21st Century, 39–57.

Peters, B. G. (2010b). Still the century of bureaucracy? the roles of public servants. In Public management in the postmodern era. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Peters, B. G. (2011a). Bureaucracy and democracy: Towards result-based legitimacy? In Administrative reforms and democratic governance (pp. 109–120). Routledge.

Peters, B. G. (2011b). Bureaucracy and democracy: Towards result-based legitimacy? In Administrative reforms and democratic governance (pp. 109–120). Routledge.

Rahman, A., & Risal, M. (2022). Bureaucracy Reform And Implementation Of Good Government And Implications On Employee Performance And Service Quality (Study at the Regional Revenue and Finance Office of Palopo City). Jurnal Mantik, 6(1), 271–275.

Risal, S., Bajari, A. H., & Hergianasari, P. (2022). Sumber Daya Alam dalam Pusaran Pilkada Serentak. Kemudi: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(02), 135–148.

Rizki, A., & Turner, M. (2023). How do public sector auditors perceive the concept and practice of auditor Independence? Evidence from Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(2), 199–216.

Sembiring, W. M. (2021). Birokrasi Dan Kekuasaan Politik Lokal: Politisasi Birokrasi Atau Birokrasi Berpolitik? NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 8(1), 295–299.

Septiani, E. (2023). Analisis Terhadap Upaya Penguatan Implementasi Kebijakan Netralitas ASN Dalam Pemilu. Ebisma (Economics, Business, Management, & Accounting Journal), 3(1), 23–36.

Setiawan, A., & Fauzi, E. A. (2019). Etika kepemimpinan politik dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan Indonesia. Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Kebijakan (JPK), 1(1), 1–12.

Setyasih, E. T. (2023). Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Tantangan Implementasi Good Governance di Indonesia. Jurnal Kelola: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 48–62.

Svara, J. H. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176–183.

Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333–351.

Wibawa, S. (2005). Reformasi administrasi: bunga rampai pemikiran administrasi negara/publik. (No Title).

Wibowo, A., & Giessen, L. (2015). Absolute and relative power gains among state agencies in forest-related land use politics: The Ministry of Forestry and its competitors in the REDD+ Programme and the One Map Policy in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 49, 131–141.

Yudiatmaja, W. E. (2015). Politisasi Birokrasi: Pola Hubungan Politik dan Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (JUAN), 3(1), 10–28.

Zuhro, R. S. (2016). Reformasi Birokrasi Lokal Melalui Pelayanan Terpadu. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 5(1), 31–45.

Zuhro, R. S., Juoro, U., & Chaniago, A. (2007). Profesionalitas dan netralitas birokrasi: Menuju daya saing ekonomi daerah: Studi di empat provinsi. (No Title).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.56681/da.v20i2.144

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 53 times
PDF - 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika Administrasi (MIDA) Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Wijayakusuma Purwokerto

Alamat:

© Copyright 2019 FISIP UNWIKU . Powered by TIM IT